Just as per rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not preciso forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if a rabbi must forbid something merely because of a question of law, because of a custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not preciso establish an erroneous precedent.
Nevertheless, it is forbidden for verso city preciso split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice
A rabbi should be careful not onesto render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead esatto erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only con the case of verso scholar, and which may not be taught esatto the ignorant.
When a rabbi renders per decision con verso case per which there are giammai clear precedents, he must strive esatto bring as many proofs as possible…
When a rabbi renders a decision in per question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when per rabbi decides on per case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.
Since the initial decision renders the subject of a case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by verso greater sage or by verso majority rule.
An erroneous decision cannot render verso case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able to spettacolo that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.
Similarly, a decision that is retracted with good reason does not render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able preciso determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi esatto retract his decision and permit the case sopra question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for per rabbi sicuro reverse even his own decision…
Per order esatto prevent controversy, one should https://datingranking.net/it/muzmatch-review/ not present a case before per rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.
One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision puro be erroneous
Although the Torah demands verso excretion degree of uniformity mediante practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions sopra minor questions of Torah law.
However, where there is mai geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable preciso be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within per solo community, the Torah requires a high degree of uniformity mediante religious practice. Per in nessun caso case should it be made sicuro appear that there is more than one Torah.
It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden puro mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited esatto mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Preciso do so is preciso disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.
It is therefore forbidden for members of verso celibe congregation puro form factions, each following verso different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for verso celibe rabbinical breviligne to issue verso split decision.
However, where verso city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical court, the following of each one is counted as a separate community, and each one may follow different practices.